3 replies

Unions of literals / Enums

Has there been any consideration to supporting enums in the schema data types? I'm referring to enum in a very loose sense here -- basically type safety that a field will have a particular value.

Eg:

type MySupportedValues = 'this' | 'that';
defineSchema({
  table: definteTable({
    field: s.string(MySupportedValues),
  }),
});

type MySupportedValues = 'this' | 'that';
defineSchema({
  table: definteTable({
    field: s.string(MySupportedValues),
  }),
});

type MySupportedValues = 'this' | 'that';
defineSchema({
  table: definteTable({
    field: s.string(MySupportedValues),
  }),
});

type MySupportedValues = 'this' | 'that';
defineSchema({
  table: definteTable({
    field: s.string(MySupportedValues),
  }),
});

Then when utilizing I will not be able to specify a value for

table.field

table.field

table.field

table.field that isn't "this" or "that", and when i

get

get

get

get a table doc, I'll have

table.field

table.field

table.field

table.field will have a type of

MySupportedValues

MySupportedValues

MySupportedValues

MySupportedValues.

Unions of literals / Enums

Similar Threads

Similar Threads

Similar Threads